Categories: ISBM 머신 블로그

How to Reduce Scrap Rate on an ISBM Machine: Root Cause Analysis Guide

Scrap rate is one of the most telling indicators of ISBM process health. A well-optimised ISBM machine running a stable process on a validated product should produce scrap rates of 1–3% in steady-state production — primarily startup and shutdown losses. Scrap rates above 5% signal a process problem that is costing real money: every rejected bottle represents a complete cycle of material, energy, and machine time invested with no return.

The challenge with ISBM scrap reduction is that the defects can originate from any of the machine’s four stations, from the tooling, from the material, or from process parameter drift — and diagnosing which root cause is driving a particular defect requires systematic investigation rather than trial-and-error parameter adjustment. This guide provides a structured root cause analysis methodology for the most common ISBM scrap defects, enabling production teams to identify and fix the actual cause rather than just suppressing the symptom.

The Root Cause Analysis Framework for ISBM Scrap

Before investigating individual defect types, establish a consistent root cause analysis framework. This prevents the common error of jumping to process parameter changes without confirming the defect source:

Step 1

Define the Defect Precisely

What does it look like? Where on the bottle? Which cavity? What fraction of output? Started suddenly or gradually? Worse at startup or steady state? Document with photos.

Step 2

Identify When It Started

What changed? New material lot? Parameter change? Maintenance action? Mold change? If something changed when the defect started, it is the primary suspect.

Step 3

Isolate to One Station

Is the defect in the preform (injection station fault) or only in the blown bottle (blow station fault)? Pull a preform sample from the conditioning station and inspect it before it is blown.

Step 4

Change One Variable at a Time

Once a suspected cause is identified, change one parameter, run 10+ cycles, then assess the effect before making another change. Multi-variable changes make it impossible to determine which variable caused any observed improvement.

Defect 1: Short Shots (Incomplete Preform Fill)

Possible Cause	Test / Evidence	Fix
Gate frozen (nozzle tip too cold)	Short shots on specific cavity; opaque gate spot on partial preform	Raise nozzle tip temperature 3°C
Insufficient injection pressure or speed	Short shots on all cavities; preform weight low	Increase injection speed; check injection pressure setting and hydraulic pressure
Insufficient shot size (screw over-retracted)	All cavities short; check screw retraction position vs target	Increase metering stroke; check material feed from hopper
Melt temperature too low	All cavities short; high injection pressure reading; preform has flow marks	Raise barrel temperature by 5°C; check all barrel heater zones are working

Defect 2: Uneven Wall Thickness (Bottle)

Possible Cause	Test / Evidence	Fix
Non-uniform preform conditioning temperature	Wall variation follows same circumferential pattern consistently; IR scan of preform shows temperature asymmetry	Adjust conditioning zone temperatures; check heater element output uniformity
Stretch rod not centred in preform	Wall variation has consistent thick/thin side relationship; preform gate shows off-centre mark from rod	Check and re-align stretch rod to preform axis; inspect rod for bending
Preform wall thickness non-uniform (injection)	Wall variation is present in preform cross-section before blowing; mold cavity or core eccentricity	Measure preform wall thickness at multiple points; mold re-centering or core replacement needed
Insufficient pre-blow pressure for preform size	Heavy base on bottle; thin shoulder; rod marks at gate	Increase pre-blow pressure in 1-bar steps; adjust pre-blow start timing

Defect 3: Pearlescence / Haze in PP Bottles

Pearlescence — the milky, pearl-like opaque appearance in areas of PP bottles — is one of the most common and commercially damaging defects in PP ISBM production. It indicates uncontrolled cold crystallisation of the PP during blowing. The root causes are:

Too Low Conditioning Temperature

The preform enters the blow station below the PP process window (below ~125°C). PP crystallises rapidly below this temperature and the oriented crystallites appear as pearlescence. Fix: raise conditioning temperature by 3°C increments until pearlescence clears. PP window is typically 125–140°C.

Wrong PP Grade

PP homopolymer or nucleated grades are inherently prone to pearlescence regardless of temperature — they crystallise too rapidly. Only random copolymer PP (rPP) high-clarity grades are suitable for ISBM. If pearlescence cannot be eliminated despite correct conditioning, suspect a wrong grade has been loaded.

Too Slow Blow Cycle

If the preform spends too long in the blow mold before air pressure contacts it, it cools below the PP orientation window before full stretch is achieved. Fix: reduce any delay between stretch rod full stroke and main blow initiation; verify pre-blow valve response time is within specification.

Defect 4: Top-Load Failure in Service

Top-load crush strength below specification is a hidden defect — the bottle looks visually acceptable but fails under pallet stacking loads in distribution. Root causes and investigation steps:

Under-orientation (BSR too low): Calculate actual BSR from preform and bottle dimensions; if below target, preform design change is required to increase stretch ratio
Conditioning temperature too high: Over-heated preform blows with less orientation (chains have too much thermal mobility to lock in oriented configuration); reduce conditioning temperature by 2°C and re-test top-load
Heavy shoulder wall (material not distributed to sidewall): Cut cross-sections through 3 bottles to measure shoulder vs sidewall thickness; if shoulder is heavy, adjust conditioning zone profile to heat shoulder area more aggressively
Incorrect material grade: Low-IV PET or wrong-grade PP produces weaker walls at the same wall thickness; confirm material grade against specification

Building a Scrap Reduction Action Plan

After using root cause analysis to identify the primary defect driver, a structured action plan ensures the fix is durable rather than temporary:

Action	Purpose
Document confirmed root cause and corrective action taken	Creates institutional knowledge; prevents recurrence from same cause
Update the Master Process Record with new confirmed parameters	Ensures future operators start from confirmed-optimal parameters
Add defect-specific check to in-process inspection frequency for 2 weeks post-fix	Confirms that the corrective action is durable under production conditions
If root cause was a worn component, add replacement to PM schedule	Converts reactive repair to preventive maintenance for future cycles
Track scrap rate weekly for 4 weeks post-fix to confirm sustained improvement	Confirms that the OEE Quality rate has measurably improved

For support with persistent scrap problems or complex multi-defect situations on your ISBM machine, our process engineers offer remote troubleshooting consultations and on-site process audits. Contact our technical support team to arrange a scrap reduction consultation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a realistic target scrap rate for a well-run one-step ISBM machine?

For a mature production programme (validated product, trained operators, stable process) running single-material PET or PP, 1–3% total scrap is achievable and should be the target. This includes startup and shutdown losses (typically 10–20 startup cycles discarded per shift start), plus in-run defect rejects. Scrap rates consistently above 5% in steady-state production indicate an unresolved process problem that warrants systematic investigation. Rates above 10% indicate a significant problem — either tooling, process parameter, or material-related — requiring immediate attention.

My scrap rate is only high at the start of each shift. What should I check?

Elevated startup scrap is almost always a thermal equilibration issue: the machine has not reached full thermal steady state before production begins. Extend the machine warmup period before starting production (allow 20+ cycles at temperature before releasing bottles), and increase the number of startup preforms discarded before production bottles begin. If startup scrap persists beyond 30 cycles, investigate cooling water temperature consistency (chillers cycling on and off can delay thermal stabilisation) and conditioning heater element condition (low-output elements take longer to reach setpoint).

How do I distinguish a process fault from a tooling fault when investigating a scrap defect?

Key rule: if a defect affects all cavities equally, it is more likely a process or material fault (temperature, pressure, material). If it affects one cavity but not others, it is more likely a tooling fault on that specific cavity (gate wear, worn neck split, cooling channel blockage in that cavity). For single-cavity machines, compare before and after a known-good parameter set from a previous production run — if the parameters are identical and the defect is new, tooling wear or material change is the more likely cause.

High Scrap Rate on Your ISBM Machine? Get Expert Help

Describe your defect, its frequency, when it started, and what has already been tried — our process engineers can guide you to the root cause faster than trial-and-error parameter changes.

Request a Scrap Analysis Consultation

에피소드